Manufacturers Provide Your Sales Partners Competitive Analysis
Posted by admin in Sales Management on January 26, 2012
The day has passed where you make it, and they will come. Your sales network needs all the help they can get. Do you provide what it takes for your partners to sell?
Have you considered everything that it takes to understand where your product fits into the competitive landscape?
The first order of business is to have a Partner web site. Something that your sales channel partners can sign on to and get the latest information from you. Your information needs to be current and most importantly, accurate. This is the group that has hooked their horse to your wagon; you should make sure they are treated well.
You are out there in the marketplace, the big fish in your marketplace. If you have 100 dealers or distributors, then you have a view of more than 100 sales people. When you hear of an issue in the sales channel, chances are several of your dealers or distributors are experiencing the same problem. Take a pro-active stance, give all your dealers the benefit of your thoughts. You have the luxury of careful calm consideration, where your business partner may be on the spot in front of a prospect. If your biggest competitor is suddenly undercutting your price by 20%, address the issue. Clearly point out your advantages over this competitor, price is not the most important concern, if their product does not meet the consumers needs. Be sure to take enough time to completely and accurately articulate your advantages.
Key Topics For Your Competitive Analysis
1. The competitive product name and company information
2. Your closest configuration & price
3. The competition’s configuration and price
4. Your company advantages.
5. Your product advantages.
Providing competitive information is a good service you can provide for your sales partners. You have a better perspective than any individual re-seller, and can encourage your channel partners to email you when they encounter some new competition. Your initial contact and impression will come from this sales partner, be sure to give him/her credit when you publish your competitive analysis. Showcasing the sales partner will guarantee that your other partners will send you additional competitors. Each competitive write-up, may save you a sale at many of your sales partner locations. Keep them up-beat, don’t slam the competition, just lay out the facts (your way).
Provide your sales partners with a “Partner Only” web site. Include as many competitive analysis documents as you can create. Keep your partner web site up-beat cheerful, and informative.
Why Business Degrees Should Be Minimum Criteria When Hiring Sales Managers
Posted by admin in Sales Management on January 26, 2012
During a recent recruitment assignment with a client involved in the manufacturing industry, the discussion arose of whether or not the sales manager should be required to have a business degree. Typically the hiring of sales managers is focused on their experience in a particular industry and their product knowledge. For some technical products a degree in engineering related subjects often is seen as a pre-requisite due to the complicated knowledge requirements for certain products. The next criteria will be their ability to manage a team of people and deliver sales quota.
Very few advertisements rank a business degree as an important requirement and place more emphasis on industry skills and background information.
Not to say that these points are not important, but if you look at this from a different perspective and give heed to the fact that sales managers make decisions that affect the entire organization on a day-to-day basis, then maybe the criteria needs to be included.
In the discussion with my client, I explained the reasons why a business degree would be important criteria in the sales manager’s role. First and foremost the discipline of achieving a degree requires focus, dedication, structure, perseverance and the ability to prioritize. These are all skills and traits that would be optimum for a sales manager (or any manager) if you are looking for a person that is capable of growing your business and ensuring suitability.
Many of the people completing business degrees are often those returning students on a part time basis whilst fulfilling a fulltime employment role. Many Gen X people (those born in the 1960-1980 era) that have taken a career in sales, have typically left school and not pursued any university education. Typically their involvement in sales comes from a desire for freedom and self management and an easy to access career. This background gives foundation to their ‘run your own business’ mentality of managing people and a focus on relationships that often is promoted by Gen X sales managers. They were the survival skills that carried them through most of their employment.
What sales organizations have learnt over the years, and often at great expense, is that sustainable success comes from having a structured and measured approach to selling practices. The person with the degree understands those principles, has learned in that environment and personally conducted themselves in that manner. Therefore their leadership style will be a reflection of this too which is carried through to their teams.
When completing a degree, people are taught to research, solve problems and look at situations from different angles to make informed decisions. This is a major contrast to the traditional sales manager who often makes decisions on the fly in response to emotive situations or alarmist situations with customers. They are reactionary in most cases to the market and customers, and even their teams. Their skills are learned on an action-success-failure basis known as experience or being in the field. Some learn from those success-failures and others stumbling early and repeating the same issues over and over again. They are creating or attempting to create what has already been created – the wheel. However they have selected the hardest road to get to the end goal-unguided trial and error. They are basically learning on the job at great expense to themselves and those working with them.
The content contained in a degree provides graduates with a set of business principles, methods and processes that are proven to be successful giving a strong platform to develop from. It cultivates a process of thinking and decision making. Degree qualified people are not re-creating the wheel or putting the wrong wheel on the vehicle due to lack of understanding or learning basic principles on company time. They are immediately lifted to a level that can be considered arguably as some six to eight years of experience if measured in field management time.
Most importantly the degree provides them with an understanding of the repercussion of decisions they are making that affect the broader organization. How they impact the culture of the business in relation to supply-chain. How they impact the business in relation to financial management. They gain a deeper understanding of operational management and human resources. This more rounded approach provides improved decision-making, more clarity in functionality of the sales team and strong upward reporting capability contributing to strategic planning.
The person that does things on the fly is considered a high risk individual in today’s market whereas the person with the degree will have some strong business principles and understanding that will take a more pragmatic and calculated approach to management of the income of the organization.
Does the degree guarantee success? Definitely not. There are some people that struggle with the transition of knowledge to application. The important element is that if there is evidence of their ability to apply that transition of knowledge to the business then you are in a much stronger position as a company.
As evidence of the difference in the two profiles, on reviewing the resumes of the candidates for our client, there was a distinct difference in the content of what was presented. For those candidates that put forward resumes that were not degree qualified, their focus was on team spirit and customers and in the main their resumes demonstrated they focused on existing customers primarily. Often their major achievement was installing a CRM system, something that is of the most basic level in business. The level of engagement by sales people rarely cited. The primary focus of their work effort being what is best described as basics of sales management or even to say sales supervision. There were often references to trending statements around emotional intelligence and other subjects that had been through their employer’s corporate mantra.
For those that are more educated through a business degree and experienced managers, their resumes demonstrated their strategic capability, implementation parameters and output. The wording to describe achievements was business based statements that would be accepted at CEO level. They demonstrated the ability to streamline sales practices and install structure that maximized the performance of sales channels. Their references to basic management requirements or sales supervision were minimal. Their resume demonstrated thinking on a much higher level even though they were delivering the sales management functions.
In consideration of who was capable of driving the results; the answer was clear. The traditional sales manager would keep some form of a wheel on the business as long as the market stayed relatively stable. The business may endure unnecessary ups and downs and fluctuating profits as they learn through trial and error. Those ups and downs could be quite significant.
The more educated sales manager had the ability to have foresight and strategy to manoeuvre the business through changing markets. The ups and downs were only small hills and slides that did not have excess impact on the business. They were able to develop strong business practices and enabled them to be operating both at a hands-on with the team level and strategically simultaneously.
With equal knowledge of an industry and products, the degree qualified candidate will definitely come out the winner as a much lower risk to the company.
Sales managers need to consider the necessity of business degrees in the future as formal education becomes a standard offering for the younger generations as they move into management. The younger person is often seeking more than what their predecessors did for their careers and see the business degree as a leverage to higher roles in the future outside of just sales management.
With the market place continuing to endure the long tail of the global financial crisis, companies hiring are looking for lower risk placements in their companies. Certainly education ticks the box of comfort for them.
Effective Risk Management Strategies
Posted by admin in Risk Management on January 26, 2012
It is important not to lose sight of risks that may prevent us from achieving our goals. On reflection, it is not hard to come up with examples. One could encounter unforeseen health problems, physical damage from fire or flood could occur, loss of a major customer or source of funding, a serious information technology problem such as a loss of data or breach of security, or departure of a key employee.
Quite often it is challenging for small and medium size organizations to get a handle on the risks they face and as a result risk management is overlooked. Your business plan can be a very good starting point to establish a risk management plan. Consider your key objectives and ask questions including what can go wrong, how can problems happen and why could they occur. By looking at your business through this lens, you can get a reasonable perspective on the risks you should be concerned with.
Usually no one individual has a full perspective of the risks that could impact your organization. As such, it is necessary to ensure that you include all those who have relevant knowledge of risks that could impact your business as you complete your risk analysis. Completion of a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis may be helpful to identify risks that could impact your organization.
Typically it is not possible to address all risks that have been identified. Risk analysis serves to identify which risks can have a greater impact than others. Risk analysis involves combining the impact of an event with the likelihood of the event occurring using the risk analysis equation which is Risk = Consequence x Likelihood. You may want to rank the impact of a risk as significant, major or minor and rank the likelihood of occurrence as high, medium or low and document your risks in a risk matrix.
Completing this exercise will help you to identify those risks that are more likely to occur and those which may have a greater impact, and help you make decisions about committing resources and effort to manage specific risks.
After risks have been identified and analyzed, the focus shifts to risk treatment. There are various strategies to consider. Risks can be avoided by not proceeding with the activity to which a risk relates. However, such an approach can lead to missed opportunities and elevation of other risks. The likelihood of occurrence could be reduced, perhaps for example by providing safety training to staff assigned to more dangerous activities. The consequences related to a risk could be reduced. For example, if there is a risk of fire, installation of monitored fire detection equipment and suppression systems can reduce impact if a fire occurs. Risks can be shared. A common example of how risks can be shared is through insurance. A firm providing professional advisory services may wish to share risk by acquiring errors and omissions insurance. Finally a decision may be made to retain exposure to certain risks if the exposure is at an acceptable level. Overall, the treatment approach for any specific risk requires a cost benefit analysis to determine the extent to which the cost of treating a potential risk is justified.
Risk management has significant business benefits. Examples include greater potential to achieve goals and objectives, reduced exposure to litigation and non-compliance with legal obligations, enhanced relationships with external stakeholders such as your bank and greater likelihood of operating within prescribed budgets.